Comments on: Okay, here are the picks

By: Parish

Parish — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:22:12 +0000

Thanks.

By: Mac Thomason

Mac Thomason — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:09:04 +0000

Okay, new post.

By: Mac Thomason

Mac Thomason — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:06:14 +0000

Okay, okay. I don’t really have anything to say, though.

By: Parish

Parish — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:45:31 +0000

Mac, any chance of starting a new thread, as a general guideline when we get to 400+ posts?

At that point, I can no longer view these pages on my mobile as they are too big to load. I am guessing I am not the only one with this limitation.

By: Parish

Parish — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:42:51 +0000

I think 2009 is the least of our worries. It should not be a year we try too hard to contend. That is, we should not limit our opportunities to field the best team in 2010 to try to bridge too much of a gap in 2009.

That’s why I am not totally opposed to trading Escobar for Peavy. But, I would not be excited about replacing Escobar with Furcal and his bad back on a multi-year deal. I think we have a better chance of finding a replacement for Escobar in the next few years than we have of finding a replacement for Peavy.

Plus, we can use more than one ace pitcher in our rotation if another comes along. There is only one shortstop on the field.

By: Stu

Stu — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:20:38 +0000

i dont want them to get this one, braves14, that’s for sure.

By: ububba

ububba — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:11:29 +0000

Oh, for the days of Cheatin’ Charley Pell…

By: braves14

braves14 — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:06:03 +0000

I hope not. I’d hate to see Clemson actually get a good coach.

By: Stu

Stu — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:02:30 +0000

It all stems from the article I referenced, which appears to be quite bogus.

By: csg

csg — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:54:06 +0000

oh, I just heard it on two of our local radio stations. I havent read anything about it